(Re‐)Interpreting Fiduciary Duty to Justify Socially Responsible Investment for Pension Funds?
Identifieur interne : 002E41 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002E40; suivant : 002E42(Re‐)Interpreting Fiduciary Duty to Justify Socially Responsible Investment for Pension Funds?
Auteurs : Joakim SandbergSource :
- Corporate Governance: An International Review [ 0964-8410 ] ; 2013-09.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Academic conference, Best interests, Better structure, Bruckhaus, Bruckhaus deringer, Business ethics, Cambridge university press, Child labor, Climate change, Consensus problem, Contemporary debate, Corporate governance, Corporate responsibility, Critical issue, Crucial role, Current legislation, Deringer, Destitute children, Duciary, Duciary duties, Duciary duty, Duciary obligations, Duciary responsibility, Empirical hypothesis, Environmental, Environmental aspects, Environmental concerns, Environmental considerations, Environmental degradation, Environmental interests, Environmental issues, Environmental obligations, Environmental performance, Ethical opinions, Ethical reasons, Fiduciary, Fiduciary duty, Force companies, Further resources, Future growth, Future retirement pensioners, Gabriola island, Governance, Governance issues, Hawley, Hawley williams, Human rights, Important point, Individual companies, Institutional investment, Institutional investors, International review, International treaties, Investment decisions, Investor, Joakim sandberg, John wiley sons, Joly, Kiernan, Large number, Last couple, Legal remedy, Long term, Longterm interests, Lydenberg, Mackenzie lewis, Many details, Many pension funds, Margolis, Maximum returns, Nancial, Nancial institutions, Nancial interests, Nancial markets, Nancial performance, Nancial relevance, Nancial return, Nancial returns, Nations environment programme finance initiative, Natural environment, Other words, Oxford business knowledge, Oxford university press, Pension, Pension fund, Pension fund trustees, Pension funds, Portfolio, Present context, Present interpretation, Present stage, Previous literature, Previous studies, Progressive dialogue, Proponent, Public opinion, Public pension funds, Responsible investment, Responsible investors, Sandberg, Second kind, September, Sizeable retirement, Social matters, Society publishers, Solid evidence, Sparkes cowton, Stakeholder, Stakeholder concept, Stakeholder theory, Such considerations, Such engagement, Such obligations, Sustainable, Thamotheram wildsmith, Theoretical point, Traditional interpretation, Traditional understanding, Traditional view, Trustee, Unep, Universal owner thesis, Universal owners, Vast majority, Welfare interests, Western countries.
- Teeft :
- Academic conference, Best interests, Better structure, Bruckhaus, Bruckhaus deringer, Business ethics, Cambridge university press, Child labor, Climate change, Consensus problem, Contemporary debate, Corporate governance, Corporate responsibility, Critical issue, Crucial role, Current legislation, Deringer, Destitute children, Duciary, Duciary duties, Duciary duty, Duciary obligations, Duciary responsibility, Empirical hypothesis, Environmental, Environmental aspects, Environmental concerns, Environmental considerations, Environmental degradation, Environmental interests, Environmental issues, Environmental obligations, Environmental performance, Ethical opinions, Ethical reasons, Fiduciary, Fiduciary duty, Force companies, Further resources, Future growth, Future retirement pensioners, Gabriola island, Governance, Governance issues, Hawley, Hawley williams, Human rights, Important point, Individual companies, Institutional investment, Institutional investors, International review, International treaties, Investment decisions, Investor, Joakim sandberg, John wiley sons, Joly, Kiernan, Large number, Last couple, Legal remedy, Long term, Longterm interests, Lydenberg, Mackenzie lewis, Many details, Many pension funds, Margolis, Maximum returns, Nancial, Nancial institutions, Nancial interests, Nancial markets, Nancial performance, Nancial relevance, Nancial return, Nancial returns, Nations environment programme finance initiative, Natural environment, Other words, Oxford business knowledge, Oxford university press, Pension, Pension fund, Pension fund trustees, Pension funds, Portfolio, Present context, Present interpretation, Present stage, Previous literature, Previous studies, Progressive dialogue, Proponent, Public opinion, Public pension funds, Responsible investment, Responsible investors, Sandberg, Second kind, September, Sizeable retirement, Social matters, Society publishers, Solid evidence, Sparkes cowton, Stakeholder, Stakeholder concept, Stakeholder theory, Such considerations, Such engagement, Such obligations, Sustainable, Thamotheram wildsmith, Theoretical point, Traditional interpretation, Traditional understanding, Traditional view, Trustee, Unep, Universal owner thesis, Universal owners, Vast majority, Welfare interests, Western countries.
Abstract
Conceptual
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/corg.12028
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 006D22
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 006D22
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000995
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 002E54
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 002E41
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">(Re‐)Interpreting Fiduciary Duty to Justify Socially Responsible Investment for Pension Funds?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sandberg, Joakim" sort="Sandberg, Joakim" uniqKey="Sandberg J" first="Joakim" last="Sandberg">Joakim Sandberg</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DC3293357C5B1083E0991EF8C0AC9C6B0C709A6D</idno>
<date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/corg.12028</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/DC3293357C5B1083E0991EF8C0AC9C6B0C709A6D/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006D22</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006D22</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">006D22</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000995</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000995</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0964-8410:2013:Sandberg J:re:interpreting:fiduciary</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">002E54</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002E41</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002E41</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">(Re‐)Interpreting Fiduciary Duty to Justify Socially Responsible Investment for Pension Funds?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sandberg, Joakim" sort="Sandberg, Joakim" uniqKey="Sandberg J" first="Joakim" last="Sandberg">Joakim Sandberg</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Corporate Governance: An International Review</title>
<title level="j" type="sub">Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Structures and Corporate Governance</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0964-8410</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1467-8683</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">21</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="436">436</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="446">446</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope>
<date type="published" when="2013-09">2013-09</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0964-8410</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0964-8410</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Academic conference</term>
<term>Best interests</term>
<term>Better structure</term>
<term>Bruckhaus</term>
<term>Bruckhaus deringer</term>
<term>Business ethics</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Child labor</term>
<term>Climate change</term>
<term>Consensus problem</term>
<term>Contemporary debate</term>
<term>Corporate governance</term>
<term>Corporate responsibility</term>
<term>Critical issue</term>
<term>Crucial role</term>
<term>Current legislation</term>
<term>Deringer</term>
<term>Destitute children</term>
<term>Duciary</term>
<term>Duciary duties</term>
<term>Duciary duty</term>
<term>Duciary obligations</term>
<term>Duciary responsibility</term>
<term>Empirical hypothesis</term>
<term>Environmental</term>
<term>Environmental aspects</term>
<term>Environmental concerns</term>
<term>Environmental considerations</term>
<term>Environmental degradation</term>
<term>Environmental interests</term>
<term>Environmental issues</term>
<term>Environmental obligations</term>
<term>Environmental performance</term>
<term>Ethical opinions</term>
<term>Ethical reasons</term>
<term>Fiduciary</term>
<term>Fiduciary duty</term>
<term>Force companies</term>
<term>Further resources</term>
<term>Future growth</term>
<term>Future retirement pensioners</term>
<term>Gabriola island</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Governance issues</term>
<term>Hawley</term>
<term>Hawley williams</term>
<term>Human rights</term>
<term>Important point</term>
<term>Individual companies</term>
<term>Institutional investment</term>
<term>Institutional investors</term>
<term>International review</term>
<term>International treaties</term>
<term>Investment decisions</term>
<term>Investor</term>
<term>Joakim sandberg</term>
<term>John wiley sons</term>
<term>Joly</term>
<term>Kiernan</term>
<term>Large number</term>
<term>Last couple</term>
<term>Legal remedy</term>
<term>Long term</term>
<term>Longterm interests</term>
<term>Lydenberg</term>
<term>Mackenzie lewis</term>
<term>Many details</term>
<term>Many pension funds</term>
<term>Margolis</term>
<term>Maximum returns</term>
<term>Nancial</term>
<term>Nancial institutions</term>
<term>Nancial interests</term>
<term>Nancial markets</term>
<term>Nancial performance</term>
<term>Nancial relevance</term>
<term>Nancial return</term>
<term>Nancial returns</term>
<term>Nations environment programme finance initiative</term>
<term>Natural environment</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Oxford business knowledge</term>
<term>Oxford university press</term>
<term>Pension</term>
<term>Pension fund</term>
<term>Pension fund trustees</term>
<term>Pension funds</term>
<term>Portfolio</term>
<term>Present context</term>
<term>Present interpretation</term>
<term>Present stage</term>
<term>Previous literature</term>
<term>Previous studies</term>
<term>Progressive dialogue</term>
<term>Proponent</term>
<term>Public opinion</term>
<term>Public pension funds</term>
<term>Responsible investment</term>
<term>Responsible investors</term>
<term>Sandberg</term>
<term>Second kind</term>
<term>September</term>
<term>Sizeable retirement</term>
<term>Social matters</term>
<term>Society publishers</term>
<term>Solid evidence</term>
<term>Sparkes cowton</term>
<term>Stakeholder</term>
<term>Stakeholder concept</term>
<term>Stakeholder theory</term>
<term>Such considerations</term>
<term>Such engagement</term>
<term>Such obligations</term>
<term>Sustainable</term>
<term>Thamotheram wildsmith</term>
<term>Theoretical point</term>
<term>Traditional interpretation</term>
<term>Traditional understanding</term>
<term>Traditional view</term>
<term>Trustee</term>
<term>Unep</term>
<term>Universal owner thesis</term>
<term>Universal owners</term>
<term>Vast majority</term>
<term>Welfare interests</term>
<term>Western countries</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Academic conference</term>
<term>Best interests</term>
<term>Better structure</term>
<term>Bruckhaus</term>
<term>Bruckhaus deringer</term>
<term>Business ethics</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Child labor</term>
<term>Climate change</term>
<term>Consensus problem</term>
<term>Contemporary debate</term>
<term>Corporate governance</term>
<term>Corporate responsibility</term>
<term>Critical issue</term>
<term>Crucial role</term>
<term>Current legislation</term>
<term>Deringer</term>
<term>Destitute children</term>
<term>Duciary</term>
<term>Duciary duties</term>
<term>Duciary duty</term>
<term>Duciary obligations</term>
<term>Duciary responsibility</term>
<term>Empirical hypothesis</term>
<term>Environmental</term>
<term>Environmental aspects</term>
<term>Environmental concerns</term>
<term>Environmental considerations</term>
<term>Environmental degradation</term>
<term>Environmental interests</term>
<term>Environmental issues</term>
<term>Environmental obligations</term>
<term>Environmental performance</term>
<term>Ethical opinions</term>
<term>Ethical reasons</term>
<term>Fiduciary</term>
<term>Fiduciary duty</term>
<term>Force companies</term>
<term>Further resources</term>
<term>Future growth</term>
<term>Future retirement pensioners</term>
<term>Gabriola island</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Governance issues</term>
<term>Hawley</term>
<term>Hawley williams</term>
<term>Human rights</term>
<term>Important point</term>
<term>Individual companies</term>
<term>Institutional investment</term>
<term>Institutional investors</term>
<term>International review</term>
<term>International treaties</term>
<term>Investment decisions</term>
<term>Investor</term>
<term>Joakim sandberg</term>
<term>John wiley sons</term>
<term>Joly</term>
<term>Kiernan</term>
<term>Large number</term>
<term>Last couple</term>
<term>Legal remedy</term>
<term>Long term</term>
<term>Longterm interests</term>
<term>Lydenberg</term>
<term>Mackenzie lewis</term>
<term>Many details</term>
<term>Many pension funds</term>
<term>Margolis</term>
<term>Maximum returns</term>
<term>Nancial</term>
<term>Nancial institutions</term>
<term>Nancial interests</term>
<term>Nancial markets</term>
<term>Nancial performance</term>
<term>Nancial relevance</term>
<term>Nancial return</term>
<term>Nancial returns</term>
<term>Nations environment programme finance initiative</term>
<term>Natural environment</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Oxford business knowledge</term>
<term>Oxford university press</term>
<term>Pension</term>
<term>Pension fund</term>
<term>Pension fund trustees</term>
<term>Pension funds</term>
<term>Portfolio</term>
<term>Present context</term>
<term>Present interpretation</term>
<term>Present stage</term>
<term>Previous literature</term>
<term>Previous studies</term>
<term>Progressive dialogue</term>
<term>Proponent</term>
<term>Public opinion</term>
<term>Public pension funds</term>
<term>Responsible investment</term>
<term>Responsible investors</term>
<term>Sandberg</term>
<term>Second kind</term>
<term>September</term>
<term>Sizeable retirement</term>
<term>Social matters</term>
<term>Society publishers</term>
<term>Solid evidence</term>
<term>Sparkes cowton</term>
<term>Stakeholder</term>
<term>Stakeholder concept</term>
<term>Stakeholder theory</term>
<term>Such considerations</term>
<term>Such engagement</term>
<term>Such obligations</term>
<term>Sustainable</term>
<term>Thamotheram wildsmith</term>
<term>Theoretical point</term>
<term>Traditional interpretation</term>
<term>Traditional understanding</term>
<term>Traditional view</term>
<term>Trustee</term>
<term>Unep</term>
<term>Universal owner thesis</term>
<term>Universal owners</term>
<term>Vast majority</term>
<term>Welfare interests</term>
<term>Western countries</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Changement climatique</term>
<term>Gouvernement d'entreprise</term>
<term>Gouvernance</term>
<term>Droits de l'homme</term>
<term>Opinion publique</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Conceptual</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list></list>
<tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Sandberg, Joakim" sort="Sandberg, Joakim" uniqKey="Sandberg J" first="Joakim" last="Sandberg">Joakim Sandberg</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002E41 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002E41 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Exploration |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:DC3293357C5B1083E0991EF8C0AC9C6B0C709A6D |texte= (Re‐)Interpreting Fiduciary Duty to Justify Socially Responsible Investment for Pension Funds? }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |